Click on image to enlarge.
|
Title: Information Sheet, Foundry Branch, Stream Bed Plants, and Glover-Archbold Park, Washington, D.C.
Instructors’ Note
A student in Forest Ecology (fall 2002) at Georgetown University (GU), Washington, D.C., produced this report as an individual class project which had a limit of about 20 hours.
Goals of the projects included:
(1) learning about a relatively natural forest (Glover-Archbold Park which is adjacent to Georgetown University), the “open urban forest” of GU Campuses, and the “urban forest” in residential neighborhoods near GU.
(2) providing information about these subjects to interested parties via the Internet.
These are short projects that lay groundwork for further investigation in their respective areas.
Therefore, these are pilot projects.
To see all of the 2002 projects, please use the keyword FE2002R on this Website.
Projects of future Forest Ecology students might continue lines of investigation of the 2002 projects.
E. M. Barrows and N. Bakkour, instructors
Variation of Plant Species in the Stream Bed in
Glover-Archbold Park, Washington D.C.
Michael Bernstein
Department of Biology
Georgetown University
Forest Ecology 355, Fall 2002
Abstract
In this investigation, I attempted to determine what plant species live in the
stream bed in Glover-Archbold Park. To accomplish this task, I ran five random
east-west transects across the stream and identified the plants within 1 m on
each side of the transect. The abundances of each species were also recorded so
the relative success rate of the plants could be deduced. Furthermore, I
classified the species as invasive or native to determine the percentage of
invasion in the streambed. My results show that invasive species are more
successful than the natives, accounting for 77% of the species examined.
Finally, I speculate as to the reasons why certain plant species were observed
in certain transects and absent in others.
Introduction
Although it is easy to become fascinated and engulfed in the large tree
specimens and extensive biodiversity contained in Glover-Archbold Park, one must
not overlook the beauty and importance of the streambed or the species that
inhabit it. In general, streambeds are channels through which natural streams of
water runs or used to run. The stream in Glover-Archbold appears to fluctuate
between the extremes, depending on the amount of precipitation it receives.
During times of intense drought, no running water exists in the stream, and only
a few spots hold standing water. On the other hand, after days of abundant
rainfall, water runs throughout most of the stream. More frequently, though, the
latter is observed. The amount of water flowing in the stream inevitably affects
what types of plant species can occupy it at a given time; some may be adept at
establishing strong roots in the streambed and survive strong water flow while
others may be susceptible to these kinds of conditions and can be easily washed
away. An additional factor that contributes to the amount of water flow is the
width of the stream. The Glover-Archbold stream meanders for the entire length
of the park, alternating between narrow and wide banks along the way. Narrow
banks cause an increase in water velocity and may limit the types or number of
plants that can survive, while wider banks slow the water flow, facilitating the
survival of plants with weaker roots.
Another feature affecting plant diversity in the streambed is the presence of
invasive, as opposed to native, species. Invasive species threaten the integrity
of forests and frequently prevail over native plants in obtaining necessary
resources. Native species are often rendered defenseless while the invaders
thrive in their new environment. They often crowd out native herbaceous species,
reduce light levels to the forest floor, limit regeneration, or simply displace
native shrubs and saplings. In a nearby park, Rock Creek Park, more than
one-third (36%) of the 656 documented plant species are exotic, and of these, 41
are considered aggressive invaders (Salmons 1998). It is reasonable to assume
that a similar invasion is occurring in Glover-Archbold Park.
In the following investigation, the aim was to determine and classify the plant
species living in the streambed of Glover-Archbold Park. I discovered the types
of plant species that inhabit the streambed as well as their relative
abundances. Once all of the species were recorded, I identified those that were
invasive or native to establish the amount of invasion that the park has
experienced and the success rate of each. Lastly, an examination of all of the
data was required so as to conclude which species appeared to be the most
successful of those observed and the factors that determine whether or not a
certain species lived in a particular location in the stream.
Materials and Methods
I ran five random east-west transects across the stream and took a census of the
plants within 1 m on each side of the five transects as well as recorded the
species abundances. I chose variable locations for the transects, one with dense
vegetation, others with sparse vegetation, and one with little plant life. The
plants were than classified as either invasive or native. Finally, the results
were tabulated and organized into the subsequent table.
Results and Discussion Although there were clearly dominant plant species
present at nearly every plot, the investigation proved that the variation exists
in the streambed. In the examination, 17 species were identified and a total of
131 plants were recorded. Of these 131, 101 were categorized as alien, leaving
only 30 as native (Table 1). According to these numbers, invasive species
represent 77% of the plants observed, which is a significant increase from the
36% invasion documented in Rock Creek Park. Thus, the streambed appears to
present an environment in which alien plants can flourish and out-compete native
species for vital resources.
This investigation also revealed that the survival of the plants may be
dependent on the width of the stream banks. At plot 2 where the banks were close
together, I saw no vegetation. Although there was no water running during the
days of observation, I can speculate that the narrow banks cause an increase
water velocity, which forcefully washes away any plant life living in the area.
On the contrary, when the bank widened, dense greenery appeared, though the
Asiatic Waterpepper was undoubtedly the most prominent (Table 1). As I continued
down the stream toward plot 4, I noticed scattered vegetation with much
diversity. The wide banks at this location appeared to aid the existence of some
woody plants that were not observed at other transects. Although large woody
plants were conspicuously absent, the light water flow allowed for the survival
of woody seedlings, such as Red Maple and Eastern Sycamore. At the fifth plot,
which contained an area of standing water, it seemed that mostly vines were able
to survive, while the running stream must have uprooted any tree seedlings.
In conclusion, I learned that the streambed in Glover-Archbold Park has
considerable variability for with only five plots, 17 different plant species
were classified. Furthermore, I concluded that invasive plants appeared to be
most successful, representing more than three-quarters of the species
identified. And lastly, analyses of the transects showed that survival of
certain plant species seemed dependent on the width of the banks and the amount
of potential water flow.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Dr. Edd Barrows for granting me the opportunity to
experience and enjoy fieldwork and assisting me with any hurdles that I
encountered. I would also like to thank Kellie Rooney for spending many hours
with me in Glover-Archbold Park so that I could complete my project. Lastly,
thank you to my parents and my sister for supporting me in all my endeavors and
giving me all the encouragement in the world.
Literature Cited
Salmons, S. 2000. Rock Creek Park Invasive Non-Native Plant Mitigation Program Final
Report. Internet file. http://www.nps.gov/rocr/natural/final.htm
Table 1. The plant species in the five transects in the
Foundry Branch (= streambed of Glover-Archbold Park) listed in order of their
abundance within transect.
|
|
|
Transect 1. Intermediate
Vegetation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxon (genus, species, etc) |
Common Name |
Family |
Division |
Habit |
Invasive or Native |
Number of Individuals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polygonum cespitosum |
Asiatic Waterpepper |
Polygonaceae |
Anthophyta |
Forb |
Invasive |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ulmus americana |
American Elm |
Ulmaceae |
Anthophyta |
Tree |
Native |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morus alba |
White Mulberry |
Moraceae |
Anthophyta |
Tree |
Invasive |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geum |
Avens |
Rosaceae |
Anthophyta |
Forb |
Native |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxalis europea |
European Yellow Wood Sorrel |
Oxalidaceae |
Anthophyta |
Forb |
Native |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ampelopsis brevipedunculata |
Porcelainberry |
Vitaceae |
Anthophyta |
Woody vine |
Invasive |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fraxinus americana |
White Ash |
Oleaceae |
Anthophyta |
Tree |
Native |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lindera benzoin |
Spicebush |
Lauraceae |
Anthophyta |
Tree |
Native |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transect 2. No Vegetation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transect 3. Dense Vegetation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polygonum cespitosum |
Asiatic Waterpepper |
Polygonaceae |
Anthophyta |
Forb |
Invasive |
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liriodendron tulipifera |
Tulip-tree |
Magnoliaceae |
Anthophyta |
Tree |
Native |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ampelopsis brevipedunculata |
Porcelainberry |
Vitaceae |
Anthophyta |
Woody vine |
Invasive |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhus radicans |
Poison Ivy |
Anacardiaceae |
Anthophyta |
Shrub, woody vine |
Native |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morus alba |
White Mulberry |
Moraceae |
Anthophyta |
Tree |
Invasive |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transect 4. Scattered
Vegetation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polygonum cespitosum |
Asiatic Waterpepper |
Polygonaceae |
Anthophyta |
Forb |
Invasive |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhus radicans |
Poison Ivy |
Anacardiaceae |
Anthophyta |
Shrub, woody vine |
Native |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ailanthus altissima |
Tree-of-heaven |
Simaroubaceae |
Anthophyta |
Tree |
Invasive |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ampelopsis brevipedunculata |
Porcelainberry |
Vitaceae |
Anthophyta |
Woody vine |
Invasive |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platanus occidentalis |
Eastern Sycamore |
Platanaceae |
Anthophyta |
Tree |
Native |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poales (order) |
Grasses, Sedges, Rushes |
3 Families |
Anthophyta |
Poads |
Native |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prunus serotina |
Wild Black Cherry |
Rosaceae |
Anthophyta |
Tree |
Native |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fraxinus americana |
White Ash |
Oleaceae |
Anthophtya |
Tree |
Native |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acer rubrum |
Red Maple |
Aceraceae |
Anthophyta |
Tree |
Native |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transect 5. Standing Water |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhus radicans |
Poison Ivy |
Anacardiaceae |
Anthophyta |
Shrub, woody vine |
Native |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polygonum cespitosum |
Asiatic Waterpepper |
Polygonaceae |
Anthophyta |
Forb |
Invasive |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedera helix |
English Ivy |
Araliaceae |
Anthophyta |
Woody vine |
Invasive |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Albizia julibrissin |
Mimosa |
Fabaceae |
Anthophyta |
Tree |
Invasive |
1 |
update
template
�Copyright 2009 Georgetown University |